Reference Materials

Description

Every writer has a shelf or two, or six, of reference materials. What's in your library?

Synonyms for Walk

Submitted by eddycurrents on Sun, 08/08/2004 - 4:06am

Here are some ways for characters to walk, culled from various places:

walk:

amble, bumble, careen, clomp, clump, crawl, creep, dawdle, dodder, drag, flounce, hike, hoof, inch, lag, leg, limp, linger, loiter, lollop, lumber, lurch, march, mince, mosey, move, pace, pad, parade, plod, poke, pound, prance, promenade, prowl, pussyfoot, ramble, reel, sashay, saunter, scuffle, shamble, shlep, scuttle, shuffle, skulk, slink, slog, slouch, sneak, stagger, stalk, stamp, steal, step, stomp, stride, stroll, strut, stumble, stump, swagger, tack, tap, thread, tiptoe, toddle, track, traipse, traverse, tread, trot, trudge, waddle, wade

Any others?

Quotations

Submitted by DaveK on Thu, 03/18/2004 - 12:00am

I think it was Arthur C Clarke who said - Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. It is number three where the first two are:

When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.

The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.

When I googled to verify my memory I came across the site - http://wikiquote.org . Pretty cool site. It is part of a group including online encyclopedia, dictionary, books and historical events. Look at http://wikimediafoundation.org/ to start.

WordWeb dictionary and thesaurus

Submitted by eddycurrents on Sat, 01/31/2004 - 3:01pm

Here's a tidy little freeware program that is commercial quality. It has 120k+ words in the word list, which are all linked in various ways (i.e. word web).

This little proggie is perfect for writers, because (1) it's small and very stable; (2) the dictionary and thesaurus are tightly integrated; and (3) differences in scope of the definitions are tabbed (try it and see what I mean).

The dictionary definitions themselves are complete but brief, not as full as a full blown dictionary program like Collins or Websters or Oxford (I have tried all those too) and without etymology. This is adequate for writing because I don't need a complicated definition, and I'm more interested in the thesaurus than the dictionary portion. Most of the bigger and more expensive programs separate the dictionary and thesaurus. And most have a clunky interface.

The Pro version adds more flexible searches (wild cards) and customizable word lists. The Pro version is only $20 US.

http://wordweb.info/

Interesting Article

Submitted by EmptyKube on Sat, 09/13/2003 - 8:19pm

Okay...copied from the email I sent the group....:)

Web Site: ScienceDaily Magazine
Page URL: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2003/09/030912072254.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Original Source: Princeton University
Date Posted: 2003-09-12

New Technique Could Lead To Widespread Use Of Solar Power; Researchers Envision Mass-produced Rolls Of Material That Converts Sunlight To Electricity
Princeton electrical engineers have invented a technique for making solar cells that, when combined with other recent advances, could yield a highly economical source of energy.

The results, reported in the Sept. 11 issue of Nature, move scientists closer to making a new class of solar cells that are not as efficient as conventional ones, but could be vastly less expensive and more versatile. Solar cells, or photovoltaics, convert light to electricity and are used to power many devices, from calculators to satellites.

The new photovoltaics are made from "organic" materials, which consist of small carbon-containing molecules, as opposed to the conventional inorganic, silicon-based materials. The materials are ultra-thin and flexible and could be applied to large surfaces.

Organic solar cells could be manufactured in a process something like printing or spraying the materials onto a roll of plastic, said Peter Peumans, a graduate student in the lab of electrical engineering professor Stephen Forrest. "In the end, you would have a sheet of solar cells that you just unroll and put on a roof," he said.

Peumans and Forrest cowrote the paper in collaboration with Soichi Uchida, a researcher visiting Princeton from Nippon Oil Co.

The cells also could be made in different colors, making them attractive architectural elements, Peumans said. Or they could be transparent so they could be applied to windows. The cells would serve as tinting, letting half the light through and using the other half to generate power, he said.

Because of these qualities, researchers have pursued organic photovoltaic films for many years, but have been plagued with problems of efficiency, said Forrest. The first organic solar cell, developed in 1986, was 1 percent efficient -- that is, it converted only 1 percent of the available light energy into electrical energy. "And that number stood for about 15 years," said Forrest.

Forrest and colleagues recently broke that barrier by changing the organic compounds used to make their solar cells, yielding devices with efficiencies of more than 3 percent. The most recent advance reported in Nature involves a new method for forming the organic film, which increased the efficiency by 50 percent.

Researchers in Forrest's lab are now planning to combine the new materials and techniques. Doing so could yield at least 5 percent efficiency, which would make the technology attractive to commercial manufacturers. With further commercial development, organic solar devices would be viable in the marketplace with 5 to 10 percent efficiency, the researchers estimated. "We think we have pathway for using this and other tricks to get to 10 percent reasonably quickly," Forrest said.

By comparison, conventional silicon chip-based solar cells are about 24 percent efficient. "Organic solar cells will be cheaper to make, so in the end the cost of a watt of electricity will be lower than that of conventional materials," said Peumans.

The technique the researchers discovered also opens new areas of materials science that could be applied to other types of technology, the researchers said. Solar cells are made of two types of materials sandwiched together, one that gives up electrons and another that attracts them, allowing a flow of electricity. The Princeton researchers figured out how to make those two materials mesh together like interlocking fingers so there is more opportunity for the electrons to transfer.

The key to this advance was to apply a metal cap to the film of material as it is being made. The cap allowed the surface of the material to stay smooth and uniform while the internal microstructure changed and meshed together, which was an unexpected result, said Forrest. The researchers then developed a mathematical model to explain the behavior, which will likely prove useful in creating other micromaterials, Forrest said.

"We've shown a very new and general process for reorganizing the morphology of materials and that was really unanticipated," Forrest said.

The research was supported by grants from the Air Force Office of Scientific Research, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory and the Global Photonic Energy Corp.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by Princeton University.

The Bible (of style)

Submitted by eddycurrents on Thu, 08/14/2003 - 8:02pm

The [b][i]Source[/i][/b] :shock: for clarity and brevity is William Strunk's The Elements of Style. It seems every professional author and writing class considers it indispensible. It's as useful now as it ever was.

It was updated some years after initial publication by E.B. White, one of Strunk's students, but the original is now public domain. You can find it online here in HTML format:

http://www.bartleby.com/141/

Or if you prefer your own copy, you can download it in Acrobat format from the web. I have a copy I can email anyone who is interested.

Or you can buy White's revised version in any bookstore. It's on it's fourth edition. That version is not public domain. It goes for around $9 softcopy at Barnes and Noble. Or you can get it at Amazon:

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/020530902X/qid=1060906374…

Space Travel by Ben Bova

Submitted by eddycurrents on Thu, 08/14/2003 - 1:32am

This book calls itself "A writer's guide to the science of interplanetary and interstellar travel". It is aimed more at hard science fiction writers, as it gets deeply into the details, although there are no equations (hooray). Topics covered include rockets and propulsion mechanisms, traveling and living in space, planets and stars, and even touches on space politics and economics. All discussions are from a writer's point of view.

It seems to be an excellent reference. It covers a wide range of topics from basic to advanced, and makes many suggestions as to how writers could use the material, or warns about pitfalls . I don't write sf but I might someday soon, especially after flipping through this book.

The copy I have is a first edition, and it shows copyright 1997. That means the book is at least 7 or 8 years old. When Bova talks about "upcoming events" that have already happened, it shows its age. However, most of the topics are timeless, and most of the rest are current enough for a writer's purposes.

It is a Writer's Digest book, ISBN 0-89879-747-0. Cover price is $17 US but I got it for half that (book sale).

A few good websites

Submitted by eddycurrents on Fri, 08/08/2003 - 12:51am